5 years without Tony Benn – Stop the War laments


Stop the war campaign is now largely defunct, but at the time of the second Iraq War in 2003 it had a genuinely mass following.

Lindsey German still loves to wax lyrical about the glorious “2 million person march”, which was the defining moment of her career and the high point of StW. Despite this march being largely organised and mobilised by sections of the national (capitalist) press, and in fact the movement totally failing in its aims to stop the IRAQ or ANY OTHER war, she revels in the movement, even 15 years on.

Principally because she still doesn’t understand what led to the fleeting ‘success’ of that moment, and secondarily because it was all down-hill from there! That doesn’t bother Lindsay. There’s still just enough political credibility to be rinsed and money to be garnered from the echoes of that movement, so it is rare to hear her start any speech without alluding to her rebelliousness for “trampling the grass of Hyde park” underfoot.

Moreover, despite the leeches of the SWP dominating its position and finances (later Counterfire seized the organisation from them when they split away from their trotskyist brethren), in the 5 years or so after the Iraq war started, StW formerly maintained participation from many political groups and shades of opinion.

But with StW leadership monopolised by the worst elements of trotskyite and revisionist ‘socialists’ (John Reese, Lindsey German, Andrew Murray), they practiced their divisive sectarianism and censorship relentlessly, gradually driving out all perceived ‘opposition’ from their ranks, and confining the movement to the channels of limp parliamentary cretinism.

Repeated calls from the conference floor to encourage and lead campaigns for non-cooperation to imperialist war crimes were ignored, and when eventually these resolutions were forced through their congress they were shelved and sidelined.

Dominated by ‘left labourites’ such as Benn and Corbyn, the latter kept the anti-war movement tied to the Labour party, despite the fact that Labour was in fact waging the very war they claimed to oppose (Tony Blair was THEIR leader, let us not forget.)

This was then and in altered form remains now, the modus operandi of the British ‘left’ Labour-allied trotskyite and revisionist movement. They were viciously sectarian in hounding out opposition to this social democratic servitude, and to any voice raise against the Labour party.

Campaigning fo the Labour party (not their remit!), has remained the core mission of StW and the meaning of their cries of ‘non-sectarian’, which always acts as a prop for parliamentary cretinism, and social chauvinism – and is their occasionally stated reason for refusing to draw the anti-war movement into creative channels of actually threatening imperialist war. Nothing must be done to damage the chances of Corbyn’s election possibilities, we are told ( – perhaps they should give this advice to JC himself!)

As a result ’Stop’ the war ultimately wound up following its Labour masters (‘Red Ed Miliband’) into SUPPORTING imperialist wars of destabilisation, notably against Libya in 2011 and Syria in 2012.

To return to Counterfire’s (StW) hypocritical lionisation of themselves in the form of Tony Benn, let us be unafraid to give him his historical due. Two facts alone will suffice to recall his true role and character:

  1. Tony Benn was a tireless fighter for more and grater sanctions against the starving people of Iraq in 2003 (Along with such ‘democrats’ as Madeleine Albright). He had a singular ability to frame these attacks as being ‘against war’ (“Sanctions have not run their course”), while being impeccably pro-imperialist!
  1. Tony Benn, as British Secretary of State for energy, conspired with the racist apartheid state of South Africa to rob occupied Namibia (then SW Africa) of its uranium for British nuclear power and weapons. Check the details of the Rossingham contract, and see for yourself.

Now that is a Good social-pacifist / social-imperialist, as Lenin would have termed him! No wonder the campaign for nuclear disarmament (CND) considered him, like his successor JC a safe pair of hands to ‘lead’ and limit the scope of their ‘peace movement.’

‘Stop the war’ tell us, of their good friend and former comrade (Benn): “He never left Labour, but was critical of much of its politics and always encouraged people to be involved in activity as their starting point in politics.”

Moreover, say StW, “he was completely committed to united work. He disliked sectarians [anti-imperialists] and couldn’t understand why some on the left spent their time attacking one another [ie criticising the Labour Party and its betrayal of the working class].”

Indeed. Tony Benn was determined to act as a prop of the parliamentary system (‘democracy’ – if only for the wealthy) and the Labour party (social-democracy), which in turn acts as the chief conductor of British ruling-class influence into the British working class movement.

He gave up his peerage – but never his love and service for the British ruling class. With friends like these, what need have the working-class for enemies?

Support the Venezuelan People: Support President Maduro! No war for Oil!




2019-01-09On Friday 4th January 2019, the Lima Group of nations, at a conference in which Trump’s Secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, made an appearance by video-link, have issued a declaration that the Venezuelan government is illegitimate, denounced it for human rights violations, questioned its territorial legitimacy, and imposed sanctions on Venezuela.

 President Nicolas Maduro has characterised this move as an imperialist-sponsored attack on the constitutional and democratic order of Venezuela, and a move towards Coup d’état and direct military intervention, with the aim of gaining control of the natural resources of the Venezuelan people. 

***Support the Venezuelan people: attend the Venezuelan Embassy tomorrow, 10th January, 11am – 3pm, to show your support for the inauguration of President Nicholas Maduro! 1 Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 2HW***

Continue reading “Support the Venezuelan People: Support President Maduro! No war for Oil!”

Hands off Syria!

Red Youth have organised and taken part in demonstrations in London, outside Downing street, and across the country over the last few days, to tell ‘our’ Prime Minister and the imperialist government she heads up, that British youth and British workers say NO TO HER WAR ON SYRIA!

We don’t buy her lies and propaganda! We say victory to the real democratically elected government of Syria! We say Victory to the Syrian Arab Army! We call for defeat of ‘our’ cowardly British pilots, who took off from their base in occupied Cyprus to fire 4 tomahawk cruise missiles at the Sovereign people of Syria. They deserve to be shot down for their crimes.

This was not a humanitarian mission, it was an illegal and unprovoked attack on the right of a Sovereign people to self-determination. It is just one episode in the long stream of aggressive wars and interventions that Britain under NATO has taken a shameful part in – we say: NOT IN OUR NAME!

Watch footage from the London demonstration, including speeches and interviews from CPGB-ML comrades here:

Well done to everyone who joined us to demonstrate against war in Syria on Friday. Comrades also held demonstrations across the country on Sunday 15 April in Brighton, Bristol, Leeds, and Manchester.

Although touted as a “one-off” strike to chide Assad for the fictional chemical attack in Douma, we know it is in reality one part in a long series of aggressions against not just the Syrian people, but against all nations that dare stand outside the sphere of western imperialism.

Hear what Syrian representative to the United Nations, Dr Bashar Ja’afari, had to say about the illegal strikes against his country here:

We know that, unfortunately, the solution to war is not to be found in a big enough demonstration, a strongly-worded petition, nor the prospect of an ‘anti-war’ government, as no such thing is permissable while we live under the heel of imperialism.

It is clear that a wide section of the British population are becoming increasingly skeptical of the bourgeois government and media. The opportunity to bring our message to workers and point them in the direction of our class enemy has not been so clear in a long time.

Understand imperialism’s drive to war:

If you’re not already active and involved with us, consider becoming a supporter. If you can, make a donation as well. No amount is too small (or large!) and goes solely towards funding party work – publishing our paper Proletarian, printing and distributing political material such as our leaflets and pamphlets, hosting meetings, preparing banners and placards for demonstrations, sending comrades to work with new and existing branches, and many other tasks.

Read more: https://cpgb-ml.org/ Become a supporter: https://www.cpgb-ml.org/join/ Donate: https://www.cpgb-ml.org/donate/

The Rise of Fascism in the USA

Popular discourse in the US has been focused on the ‘Alt-Right’ for some time now, popularly described as a new far-right movement which made a name for itself during Donald Trump’s successful presidential campaign in 2016, utilising strategies ranging from the use of memes on social media and image boards like 4Chan to spread their agenda to the open and active use of terrorist violence, as in the case of James Alex Fields, who drove into counter-protesters at the ‘Unite the Right’ rally in Charlottesville last year, murdering Socialist organiser Heather Hayer in cold blood. The so-called ‘Alt-Right’ is a terrorist, nationalist, anti-modernist, anti-communist and, primarily, capitalist movement. It is a movement of the intellectual class masquerading as the working class, using the rhetoric of the oppressed to fight for a system which only serves to intensify oppression. The Alt-Right, as a label, is used to recuperate the ideas of Fascism as to make them easier to swallow, so to speak, much like how the term ‘National Socialist’ was used to make far-right capitalist ideas sound appealing to the semi-class conscious German worker of the 1930s.

The primary tactic of the modern American fascist is to appear, just as the Nazis and the Italian Fascists did before them, as a movement for liberation against an omnipresent and all powerful enemy. For the Nazis it was the Jew, his ideology of ‘Cultural Bolshevism’, and for the ‘Alt-Right’ it is ‘The Globalist’ and his ideology of ‘Cultural Marxism’, a non-specific concept whereby every university, government institution, news outlet and NGO has been infected and is leading to the degeneration of the West. Their solution? Destroy the ideology and its propagators. However, when you have an idea so non-specific as “Cultural Marxism” or “Postmodernism” (another term used by American fascists with a wilful misunderstanding of what it actually means), anyone can be deemed a heretic and become a target to end up like Heather Hayer, dead at the hands of an angry man who convinced himself that driving a car into anti-fascist protesters would help destroy an all-encompassing Globalist agenda. It is the adaptability of the fascists to achieve their goal that allows their movement to exist indefinitely, requiring only a change in language or which ethnic/religious/cultural group should be scapegoated to seem new and, in the current case, ‘Alternative’.

British fascists are not the same as their American allies. While taking some inspiration from the Alt-Right’s easily applicable tactic of using memes to generate humour while exploiting people’s fears and insecurities, established fascist groups like Britain First and the EDL have not gained nearly as much support from the surge in white nationalist populism in the west as similar American organisations have. Despite their 1.9 Million likes on facebook, Britain First – the largest fascist organisation in Britain – has less than 1000 members nationwide and can often motivate less than 20 members to show up for their rallies. Contrast Britain First with Richard Spencer’s National Policy Institute, an organisation which frequently organises events and has made Spencer, its executive director, a household name amongst politically aware Americans. The organisation’s founder, William Regnery II, is the heir to a multi-million dollar fortune and the grandson of William Regnery I, a member of the national leadership of the white supremacist and anti-semitic America First Committee, as well as a former donor to the Democratic Party. The National Policy Institute’s leading members, it’s founder and it’s current director are all wealthy university graduates pretending to fight for America’s white working class population while being comprised entirely of white capitalists fighting for positions of power and wealth. Britain First does not have access to the millions of dollars available to the National Policy Institute through Regnery, nor does it have an understanding of political theory or sociology, both of which Richard Spencer – PhD in European Intellectual History and MA in the Humanities – does.

Georgi Dimitrov, a Marxist theoretician and revolutionary who studied and wrote about fascism for many years, defined fascism as the “open terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic, most imperialistic elements of financial capital…which cultivates zoological hatred against other peoples.” To put that in plain English, fascism is the open violent control over society by the most undemocratic, regressive and bigoted members of the ruling class, who put forward policies to divide the working class along lines of race, gender, religion and sexuality. When Dimitrov describes fascism as the “open” dictatorship of the most reactionary capitalists, he is alluding to a much larger problem. Fascism is the open dictatorship, but for it to be open it must first be hidden – a look at American foreign policy since the turn of the 20th century shows that the United States has been exporting Fascism for over 100 years, supporting the United Fruit Company’s proto-fascist takeover of Honduras in 1903 with US Army soldiers, committing terrorist attacks on railways and independent farms in the country up until 1924, occupying Nicaragua from 1912 to 1933 with a military dictatorship, destabilising the newly liberated and unified People’s Republic of Korea with the formation of the US Army Military Government in Korea south of the 38th Parallel in 1945, the takeover of the Iranian government in 1953 by US-backed monarchist rebels for the purposes of securing oil for the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (now known as BP) and, to skip several other examples to bring us up to the modern day, the funding of Al Qaida front organisation Jundullah against the current Iranian government, the 2011 takeover of Libya which led to the re emergence of slavery, the introduction of sexist and fundamentalist laws, the growth of US-backed Jihadist groups and mass destabilization the region hasn’t seen since before Gaddafi took power in 1969. The most recent and ongoing attempt by the US to export fascism overseas is the attempted takeover of Syria.


It is clear from a quick glance back at American history that the current fascists in the United States are attempting to bring fascism home, so to speak.


The USA has reached a point, for the first time since the 1930s, where open fascism has become a commonly accepted political opinion. White Supremacist organisations have hundreds of thousands of members, get featured on mainstream tv, and run channels on new media outlets such as YouTube that have staggering numbers of subscribers. Why is this?


Dimitrov argued that fascism is adopted as a tactic of capitalism, rather than as a distinct governmental form. As the threat grows from the genuinely working class movement, the communists, notions of ‘democracy’ and ‘tolerance’, which capitalist governments usually at least pay lip service too, become abandoned as decadences of a better time, at least from the capitalist’s perspective, and white supremacism, patriarchy, and countless other bigoted policies are openly adopted.


Something little known about the three most famous historical examples of fascism – Mussolini’s Italy, Hitler’s Germany and Franco’s Spain – is that they all had very strong communist movements prior to the adoption of capitalism. In Spain this even came to open war, with the communist-led Republican army fighting the fascist army of Franco, a war that sadly resulted in Franco’s victory. Even less likely to be mentioned is the Western investment into the fascist economies. American investment propped up Germany, British investment Italy, and Franco’s army was supported by every major nation except for the USSR, with funding given by all our supposedly ‘tolerant and accepting’ capitalist democracies! Fascism was adopted, fascism was supported, in order to crush the workers movement and perpetuate capitalism.


The USA faces the prospect of collapse. China now threatens their domination of the world; their One Belt One Road policy giving the US’s victims an alternative economic partner, they are no longer held in a stranglehold. Movements like Black Lives Matter are popping up in the US and exposing the white supremacist nature of organisations like the police and secret service. Public awareness is growing of the US’s abuses of the third world, and of their own citizens, particularly black, hispanic and native american citizens as well as women and LGBTQ people. It has become less and less possible for the US capitalists to hide the atrocities they commit, and so their only option has become to make these atrocities accepted by enough of the American people. Racism becomes more and more accepted an opinion, as does misogyny, under dogwhistle phrases like ‘race realism’ and ‘anti-feminism’.


The fascist movement has grown as a reaction to the increased awareness of racism, sexism and imperialism among the American people. We must be ready for such a movement to grow as knowledge increase of British atrocities, as the British becomes less trusted and people start to see the real picture of British white supremacism and imperialism, and we must be ready to combat it.



Libya: A Case Study in Imperialism

For Marxists, it is imperative that we have a detailed understanding of not just Capitalism at home, in the Imperialist centres, but also, possibly more importantly nowadays, is its effects abroad, in the nations whose recourses, wealth and people are systematically, parasitically extracted by the vampires of Imperialism. First, before we detail this particular example of the ravenous effects of the current global order, it is of paramount importance that we provide a Marxist—Leninist definition what imperialism is.

Specifically, we must dispel any notion that imperialism is when one nation annexes another piece of territory into itself, forming a very open and honest Empire (in the likes of the British and Spanish Empires). This definition is wholly inefficient at describing the true nature of imperialism. However, it is still, more often than not, touted by the Western apologists, decrying any accusation of American imperialism to be a complete hoax.

“Why, America cannot be an empire!” They cry, clutching their “#MAGA” hats, their Obama “Hope” posters, or their “Feel the Bern” garden posts. “We haven’t annexed territory in one hundred years! If anyone’s the real empire, it’s [insert America’s current enemy] because they’re [insert usually baseless accusation hypocritically spouted by the US Government]!”

The above dialogue will ring eerily true to any who’s had the unfortunate experience of arguing with an American on their nation’s foreign policy. They will not accept any accusation of imperialism because, in their warped view of the world, empires are formed by evil people wearing crowns using armies of flag-waving villains. And, due to not seeing that on their TV screens every night, as well as having no grasp on what imperialism actually is, they dismiss the arguments with a self-righteous roll of the eyes.

For the sake of both simplicity, as well as brevity, we shall define Imperialism in the following, most simplified, terms:

Imperialism is the economic control and exploitation of a nation’s resources and people.

This is certainly not as thorough a definition as is necessary for the studying of Imperialism as a whole, but for the purposes of this article, it will do fine enough.

However, that’s beside the main point of the article, which is to provide the reader with an understanding of Imperialism’s ravenous effects.  To do that, we talk here about the great loss the progressive world suffered in 2011: Muammar al-Gaddafi, one of the most selfless leaders the planet knew at the time. The reason for his loss was the bloodthirsty nature of those US imperialists who organised his vicious and anti-human overthrow. These US imperialists led the charge against the Libyan people’s government and their leader, overthrowing both of them in a bloody intervention.

Their justification?

The baseless and frankly, in light of who makes it, accusation of various human rights abuses! We, however, do know what the euphemistic phrase “human rights” means when uttered by any representative of capitalism: the rights of American, British and other wealthy nations’ corporations to drain the resources of the targeted nation for themselves, robbing the people of that nation of what is rightfully theirs.

Before we go on to discuss the true gravity of Imperialism’s repugnant consequences for the people, we must give the reader a brief look into Libya pre-2011, under the guidance of this “human rights abuser”.


Background: Libya from 1969-2011

Until the 1969 revolution, Libya was ruled as a Kingdom, bearing all the corrupt and poverty-inducing characteristics of the modern remnants of feudalism: the Kingdom of Libya, ruled by the nepotistic Idris I. During his rule, the Libyan economy grew thanks to the growth of the expansive Libyan Oil industry, hoowever, this wealth was concentrated in private hands, those of the King but even more so in the hands of Western capitalists. The revenue that did go to the Libyan state was squandered –King Idris I spent the money which should have been the rightful property of the Libyan people on his family and on buying political loyalty with reactionary Libyan tribesmen. Growth for the state, wealth for the top, poverty and destitution for the bottom: Capitalism can be defined by the Libyan Kingdom’s example.

All this ridiculousness, as it always does, took its toll on the oppressed people of Libya. Eventually, the cord snapped. A revolution ensued. In 1969, the Libyan people fought against the restraints of international monopolists and the remnants of feudalism. Idris was exiled, and a new phase of Libyan history began; the one defined by the stewardship of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.

This new phase was cemented with the declaration of the “Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya”, following the guidelines of Colonel Gaddafi’s political philosophy.

Before we go on to discuss the immense benefits and freedoms enjoyed by the Libyan people under Gaddafi’s stewardship, we must first clarify two things: 1) The Libyan example is not Socialism in the Marxist sense (in fact, it very outwardly rejected Marxist Socialism as a failure). As such, we certainly do not propose that the Libyan system be exported to the entire planet (even if such a feat was even feasible, which it certainly isn’t). 2) We support the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya based upon the principles of anti-imperialism, the idea that a nation and a people are free to decide their own fate and resist the strings of Capitalist Imperialism. What the rest of this article aims to demonstrate is just why we are anti-imperialist, with the backing of pure, hard, fact-based evidence.

First of all, the accusation of a dictatorship has absolutely no basis in reality, simply a delusion of the mind of the consumer of Imperialist propaganda. Under the L.A.J., democracy was infinitely better than its American counterpart. Libya had one of the closest systems to direct democracy in the entire world, reflecting Libya’s commitment to human rights and the rights of people to democracy and representation in the running of their nation. This stands in stark contrast to the image we’re usually given of the Libyan leader, one of brutality and repression.

The Libyan people were also granted much more in terms of quality of life guarantees than in any western country. Free, universal, high-quality education and healthcare was guaranteed to all citizens of the L.A.J., giving their citizens the highest living standard on the African continent throughout most of its history. How, one may question, was Libya able to pay for all of this? Through taxes of 100%? Of course not. The method by which the Libyan people were provided with the bare basics of life was simple: the Libyan oil fields. The Libyan people, once Gaddafi became their ideological guide, received the benefits of the nation’s oil, starkly contrasting the system seen under Capitalist exploitation.

As well as the prior two human rights the Libyan people were granted, rights which the Capitalists of the West wish at every turn to take from all the world, they were provided, free of charge, electricity to all their homes. In fact, what may come as a surprise to a reader, Libya produced so much electricity that they gave it away to their neighbouring nations, still able to provide it to all their own citizens.

Already, Libya is clearly being shown in its true light –a prosperous nation who provides all the oppressed peoples of the Earth with hope and courage.

Citizens were, adding to the previously listed rights, given, through the government, interest-free loans so as to gain as high a quality of life as possible. On top of that, newlyweds were provided with $50,000 home buying money, new mothers with $5,000 upon the birth of their child and the unemployed with the average monthly salary of their profession whilst they search for a job. All of this was not to be repaid. As much as it may be difficult to understand for the parasites who support the rule of capitalism this was all given because the Government was there to support and assist its citizens in achieving the highest quality of life possible.

These are by no means the only rights afforded to the Libyan people during the Gaddafi era which even citizens of the West would yearn for, but it’s the last one we’ll give in this article.


The Great Imperialist Theft

In 2011, all of the progress of Libya was stolen from the Libyan people. During the so-called “Arab Spring”, the NATO Imperialists, spearheaded by the figureheads of B.H. Obama and H.R. Clinton, took down the Gaddafi government and crushed the freedom of Libya under their freedom-loving jackboot!

It must be noted here that while Obama and Clinton acted as the figureheads of this campaign, they were just that. Figureheads. This criminal campaign would have been carried out if any leader (except, of course, a truly Socialist one) was in power in the US. The true orchestrators of this disgusting feat of lawless disregard for the wants and desires of an entire nation of people were the same as those who organised similar attacks on freedom in Iran and Chile (getting rid of the popular Mohammad Mosaddegh and Salvador Allende respectively). That is to say, the overlords of Capital, those who control the Governments of the world on puppet strings, the monopolists who fear the liberation provided by Socialism! They were the ones who wished for this to happen since they had the misfortune to witness the freeing of Libya in the 1960s. These Capitalist blood-suckers, of course, choose this line of action for the reason of their unsung motto: “Profit before people, flames before freedom!”

They attacked Libya because Gaddafi refused to accept the petrodollar. They attacked Libya because Gaddafi was looking to establish a central African bank and currency, one that would be backed by the natural mineral wealth of Africa and that would in effect end imperialism and neo-colonialism in Africa forever.



Imperialism’s Calamitous Consequences

With the backing of the UN and NATO imperialism, a new “democratic” government was set up in 2011, formed of all those criminals who fought against Gaddafi in the Imperialist conquest of the nation. This new system, however, even with all the possible backing from all the great Bourgeois powers of the planet, did not have the support of the average Libyan, whose allegiances still lay with the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya! As a result of a complete lack of support, both official government popularity statistics, as well as voter turnout statistics, have been in freefall since the birth of this new system.

In regard to the old rights enjoyed by the people of Libya under Colonel Gaddafi’s great stewardship (free electricity, healthcare, practically free housing, etc.), all such human rights have been ripped from the hands of the people by the brutal, criminal Dogs in power. Rolling blackouts grip the suburbs of the nation’s capital, Tripoli. Healthcare too stands in a state of disrepair. For the exploited Libyan citizen, nowadays, it is nearly impossible to find a doctor nurse to treat them if need be, a majority of those qualified in such professions fleeing the country upon Gaddafi’s overthrow.

Even ignoring these obviously disgusting facts, turning instead to look only at the facts relating to the reason the imperialists claimed to be fighting against Gaddafi’s popular government, namely, supposed abuse of “basic human rights” (again, ignoring the obvious fact that healthcare, education, etc. are also human rights). Even on that front, the Imperialists lose in a spectacular fashion!

Now, in Libya, it is illegal to give support for the old way of life. Specifically, it is a criminal offence to show support for the man who made the old way of life for the Libyan people possible. Pro-Gaddafi protests are regularly met with police brutality and violence, attempting to silence that which cannot be silenced: The people’s calls for liberty and justice!

However, while calls for justice are a punishable offence, met with the full brutality of a capitalist police force, it is quite eye-opening to note what is not considered an offence by the Dogs: Slavery! Yes, in New Libya, slavery is a ripe phenomenon. Sub-Saharan Africans are captured on their way to Europe and being sold to the highest bidder in old-fashioned sales just on the outskirts of Tripoli. Often, these poor people are sold for less than £300.

Every reported slave market has taken place in the territory of the ‘moderate’ and ‘freedom-loving’ NATO-backed government. Several groups vie for control of Libya, but no slave markets take place in areas they control. No, it is only where Western freedom’s light has shone that this barbaric practise takes place.

Whilst all this happens, in full view of the criminal cabal in control, and the imperialists who control them, nothing is done to stop this. There are no NATO airstrikes against their puppets (for obvious reasons), there is no nation crippling sanctions on Libya by the UN (though they have begun to “consider” it). In fact, the EU wishes to give Libya the task of catching escaping migrants to stop them reaching the shores of Europe, even as their civilians begin to wake up to the appalling conditions faced by these migrants (who are being practically condemned to either slavery or death by the Imperialist European Union).


The Media’s Lies and Silence

During the lead up to Gaddafi’s overthrow, all the West’s propaganda machines turned out a myriad of stories and reports condemning the leader and his nation to death, spouting baseless reports of “human rights violations” and praising the NATO-backed rebels as “freedom fighters” who sought nothing more than to destroy the “authoritarian dictatorship” in Libya, though that would also take with it all the progressive features of the Libyan nation.

What the media neglected to report on, however, was the vile facts about these “freedom fighters” which were very known to them at the time. Namely, they neglected to reveal them as the racist, terrorists, Islamic fundamentalists that they were, despite those being the very things the west claims it is the most ardent fighter against!

As all the Imperialist powers of the Capitalist world got together and swept from power the Libyan people’s government, replacing it with racists and terrorists. And all throughout this criminal act, there was not a peep of real opposition from the media of the west.

If we fast forward a few years to today, when the real ravenous results of Imperialism in Libya have come to light, slavery being chief amongst them, such crimes against humanity barely gets a footnote. Instead, days’ worth of frontpage headlines go to the engagement of Prince Harry and spreading constant baseless and misleading speculation about the possible significance of Kim Jong-un’s latest lunch!

Western media has proven, for any in doubt of the fact already, that it is the mouthpiece of Capital and will stop at nothing to cover up the consequences of Capitalism.

We encourage all our British readers to give their full support to African Lives Matter, an organisation protesting in favour of the rights of black Africans against slavery and abuse.

Long live the Libyan Green Resistance!

Further Reading:

Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism – Vladimir Lenin

Neo-colonialism, the Last Stage of Imperialism – Kwame Nkrumah

How Europe Underdeveloped Africa – Walter Rodney